From PCJ Editor Wayne Senville:
It’s an all too common failing, we tend to lose sight of the natural and man-made assets our communities offer: our history, our landmarks, our natural features, the special character of our downtowns and main streets.
Sometimes we recognize them too late, as Joni Mitchell reminds us in her well-known lyrics: “Don’t it always seem to go, that you don't know what you’ve got till it’s gone. They paved paradise and put up a parking lot.”
In the Winter issue of the Planning Commissioners Journal (due out January 27th), you’ll find several articles on this theme. Gwendolyn Hallsmith starts by reminding us of the economic benefits that can come from recognizing our natural and cultural assets. You'll then read Rob Voigt’s account of how four towns in Ontario have come together to map them out.
Another way of enhancing our assets can come from a combination of strengthening our urban cores, while conserving farmland and natural resources. Beth Humstone discusses one tool for accomplishing this: urban growth boundaries.
As I mentioned last month, the Winter issue also marks the debut of a new partnership we've entered into with a terrific non profit organization, the Project for Public Spaces (PPS). One of their principal interests is ensuring that community assets, in particular parks and open spaces, are well-used and maintained. In our Winter issue, PPS staff highlight their eleven principles for creating great community places.
The physical character and beauty of our cities, towns, and countryside is also a valuable asset. Ed McMahon, a senior fellow at the Urban Land Institute, argues that billboards undermine this, with negative economic impacts.
While some still claim that aesthetics is not within the purview of local government, the Supreme Court over a half-century ago said otherwise.[1] Moreover, as planning historian Laurence Gerckens has pointed out, the impetus for community planning in the U.S. at the turn of the 19th century centered on aesthetics: “realizing an inspiring good order in the public environment while protecting the positive qualities of both the natural environment and the cultural heritage.”[2]
Finally, let’s not forget that it’s engaged citizens who are any community’s most valuable asset -- including dedicated, informed planning board members. In our Winter issue, Carolyn Braun offers some great tips that should new planning commissioners be more effective in their new job.
Take a look at the full contents of our Winter issue -- and if you're not yet a subscriber, consider trying out the Planning Commissioners Journal for a year.
[1] See Berman v. Parker, 348 U.S. 26 (1954), where the Court found that “it is within the power of the legislature to determine that the community should be beautiful as well as healthy … .”
[2] See Gerckens, “Community Aesthetics & Planning,” PCJ #7 (Nov/Dec. 1992).